It is disappointing that we have strayed so far from the core principles of our country. One cannot blame one party, one branch of government, or one politician. “The fault lies in our stars.” The Founding Fathers, cognizant that a well-educated and civically engaged citizenry committed to their role as the guardians of the rights … Continue reading
Amanda’s Realization that tribal behavior is not just a conservative trait
Amanda Ruth inspired me to write this. My fiancé is the panacea for the the un-American group identity selfishness that Trump has infected not just the right wing, but the liberal movement in this country has somehow gone astray from its empathic roots.
Liberals now subscribe to a tribalistic mentality. We ask selfish questions like, “What can you do for my little group?” As a political scientist who payed some attention in government 101, this group/identity politics has no chance to advance the selfish agenda of some of these left wing groups are impoperly described as Progressive Movement. Yet there loss of values prevents the Progressive Movement from healing. With identity politics on the rise in the Democratic Party, as well as the use of the word social democracy that candidates have been using to position themselves further to the left of their primary opponent as a facade. Political scientist will notice that they do not define what social democracy really is. It is nothing more than a ploy to win a primary. Yet we should be focusing on winning the midterm elections with a substantial majority, and if Trumpism cannot stop political careerists from using phrases that will scare off the most popular demographics in midterm elections, then they truly deserve to be called unpatriotic. President Obama never had to label himself, thus he never put himself at risk of having a whole demographic (Grandma’s demographic–grandma who equates socialism with the Cold War and communism) punish him at the polls. It’s Democrats started being pragmatic about language, which is an incredibly important aspect of a campaign, then they would realize that they they now face the arduous task of trying to win moderate votes in places where the term social democracy or socialism is just not accepted
I no longer see myself as a member of the liberal-wing because of this clannish bevahior that is damaging our country and the soft power Obama developed.
The current left wing movement in this country in the Trump-era is a selfish group that think they are politically entitled, and they are just as guilty as the fascist wing when it comes to identity politics.
My generation built a movement that elected a black man with the name Barack Hussein Obama. We had the demonstrated to the rest of the world that we embrace diversity and empathy, and that we are not so ignorant as to judge a man by his name or skin color. We showed the world that we truly believe that, “all men are created equal,” not just white men. We proved to the world that these words are not hollow, antiquated beiefs–we truly believe that what makes this country great are the principles that are summed up in the timeless creed:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal. That they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights. That among these are life liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”
If you are born in the United States or born to an American, and you believe in these words–words inspired by God–then you are an American.
In today’s universities, the use of dialogue, also known as the Socratic method has virtually disappeared. Students are now inculcated with the belief that the rights of groups trump the rights of individuals.
Our founding documents never mentioned the rights of groups. It was always understood that all citizens have a duty to protect the rights of their fellow citizens, particularly minority rights.
The anger on the left cannot destroy what has been the common thread that all liberals have subscribed to since the genesis of this great country, and that common thread is the virtue of empathy. We have a duty to our fellow citizens to protect their rights, not just our on.
It isn’t about what one can do for LGBTQ rights, for feminism, for organized labor, for Black Lives Matter and other liberal leaning organizations. That is the selfish behavior that is antonymic to our God-given rights, and the duty that is inseperable from these rights.
We must fight against the tyranny of neo-fascist Trumpism that endangers the God-given rights of minorities in this country; The Founders wrote the Bill of Rights to protect us against the tyranny of a president who is a tyrant, a traitor, and who tramples on our Bill of Rights.
We will only succeed when we realize that love for our fellow man leads to empathy, which leads to unity. Unity can lead to more political victories and accomplishments than myopic and ineffective tribalistic political strategies.
When we shed our tribalistic and selfish motives; when we live up to the duties of a citizen of a democratic republic, revolutions happen. And it is time for Americans to contemplate this quote by Thomas Jefferson:
“The tree of Liberty must be refreshed from time to time by the blood of patriots and Tyrants.”
Where is the outrage? Is the revolution ever coming? Bill O’Reilly gets fired for sexual harassment, yet Trump who brags about sexually harassing women (and who demonstrated his lack of respect for women with his lewd comments) is elected president?!
Corporations have created a corporate feudal system in which their employees are treated like wage slaves. There are no unions to protect them, and short term profit trumps workers’ dignity.
Capitalism is meant to serve humanity; humanity isn’t meant to serve the “golden calf” of capitalism. Regulation of Wall Street is necessary to ensure that corporate greed does not cause another Great Recession. It is the working class that suffers the most from Wall Street’s bad decisions.
This is why our Founders made the government–a government of the people, by the people, and for the people–the strongest American institution. However, corporate fascists (neoliberals) like Trump and the Koch brothers systematically weaken the federal government. Under the auspices of the Koch brothers and Trump, the corporation has become the strongest American institution. Hence, we live in a corporate fascist state, not a democratic-republic.
Our Founding Fathers repeatedly said that the people have a right to rise up against the government when the government no longer serves the needs of the people, when the government becomes tyrannical. But not enough Americans are outraged.
Weapons of mass distraction–in the form of reality TV, obsession with celebrities–and materialism have distracted us from our duty as citizens of a democratic-republic to have knowledge of the issues, and to rise up against dishonest despots.
With rights come duties; the duty to not only stand up for one’s own rights, but a duty to stand up for the rights of other citizens–no matter their race, creed, or religion.
Our ancestors died to ensure the survival of the American Republic. Will we honor them by rising up against corporate fascism and by reimposing the American Democratic-Republic, or will we be the generation that stood by apathetically and ignorantly while our republic was attacked and dismantled by corporate fascists like Trump and the Koch Brothers?—with their “tax reform bill” that takes away from an already struggling middle class in order to give more to the wealthy; with their attempt to dismantle the federal government by appointing people to the cabinet who promised to rid the federal government of the very same federal departments that they now run; with their support of Citizens United, which essentially allows special interest groups to bribe our elected officials.
I am reminded of James Madison’s prescient statement:
“The latent causes of faction are thus sewn in the nature of man… to persons of other descriptions, whose fortunes have been interesting to the human passions, have, in turn, divided mankind into parties, inflamed them with mutual animosity, and rendered them much more disposed to vex and oppress each other, than to cooperate for their common good… the regulation of these various and interfering interests, forms the the principle task of modern legislation, and involves the spirit of party and faction in the necessary and ordinary operations of government”
– James Madison, The Federalist (New York: 1818) Barnes and Noble pp. 53-54
Our country is being run by a man who has one goal: destroy President Obama’s Legacy. He hasn’t gotten his way with Republicans on The Hill. They either have the political aptitude to realize that they will not win in 2018 if they repeal Obamacare without a plan to replace, or they are decent human beings who realize that the ramifications of allowing millions to lose their health insurance is unhealthy and immoral.
Trumps myopic spite demonstrates his lack of the moral decency required to rise above jealousy and spite–it vitiates his ability to make sound decisions as this country’s president.
He is full of childish spite, especially towards his predecessor, and this spite is currently his great motivator. From domestic issues to foreign affairs, he is seeking to dismantle President Obama’s Legacy.
Trump’s worldview is antonymic to the worldview of most Americans. Perhaps it is because he never had to struggle financially–his father always took care of him, and then left him millions of dollars upon his passing. Or perhaps it is his psychological illness. John’s Hopkins University doctors have diagnosed Trump as a malignant narcissist. He has the inability to empathize with those who have to struggle financially to maintain health insurance because he never had to worry about a lapse in health insurance coverage. Therefore, even though his spitefulness towards Obama will affect the healthcare of millions, including children, he has no issue with nixing key subsidies that help states provide health coverage to their most vulnerable citizens.
His spitefulness will also impact foreign affairs. He plans on tearing up the Iran Nuclear Accord–a huge diplomatic victory for the Obama Administration. What other logical reason is there for this act than pure spite towards Obama? He has not proffered any evidence that Iran is deceiving The United States. He hasn’t called for UN inspectors to investigate possible weapons-grade uranium enrichment activity. The only problem Trump has with the Accord is that it is an important part of Obama’s presidential legacy.
The proliferation of weapons of mass destruction is one of the single greatest challenges of modern international relations–so one would assume that Trump has done his due diligence in deciding to nix the Treaty. But all that matters to him is that it was promulgated by his predecessor –that’s enough to undo the hard work of our nation’s diplomats.
It is frightening that the current president is so immature and irresponsible that his governing style is based on spite towards his predecessor. Not only is Trump willing to affect the health of American citizens by tearing up Obamacare, but he also has negatively affected the health of our democratic-republic. And his presence in the Oval Office has brought the world to brinksmanship. He is a sick man. Perhaps he should make use of the health insurance, which he will never have to worry about losing, and see a psychologist.
Remember Good Will Hunting?–Specifically, do you remember the character Will Hunting? Let me refresh your memory: While at a bar with his loyal Southie friends, he notices a pretentious Harvard student trying to make his friend (Ben Affleck) look stupid in front of a group of attractive girls. Will comes to his friend’s aid. After kicking this arrogant bastard’s ass intellectually, he offers the following bit of wisdom:
The sad thing is in about 50 years you’re going to start doing some thinking on your own, and by then you’ll realize there are only two certainties in life … One don’t do that. Two, you dropped $150 grand on an education you could have received for $1.50 in late charges at the public library
After embarrassing this smug Harvard student, Will adds, “And if you got a problem with that, maybe we can step outside and deal with it that way.” (Damon, Matt; Affleck, Ben; Good Will Hunting: 1997) That scene truly reflects the many talents and virtues of Southie. It says, “Yes, I’m an intellectual, but I’m a fighter too. And my loyalty to my friends is absolute.” It is a loyalty that grows from the empathic/survivalist nature of Southie folks–people whose cultural roots are planted firmly in Ireland, so much so that we often jest that South Boston is the western-most county of Ireland.
Is this character merely a fictional character? Is it possible that the “genius old school Southie kid” has a non-fictional counterpart?
Of course, a lot of outsiders will say no. To these folks, one is stereotyped as an idiot when they either detect a “Southie accent” or hear one say, “I’m from Southie–I and 8th St.”
There are folks who will cite sociological reasons that a non-fictional Will Hunting is a fantasy. They will cite socioeconomic reasons. And they will cite cultural reasons. And they are wrong.
Anyone that knows Southie, knows that our culture is the reason why we not only survived, but thrived.
Oppressed by the English at home, the Irish diaspora began a great migration to Boston. There is but one reason why Boston and many other parts of the country claim Irish ancestry: The Irish Famine. The Irish people literally starved. The English iniquitously deprived the Irish of the crops that the Irish themselves farmed and harvested. The English brought the food home to England, and left the Irish starving to death.
The Irish Famine Memorial – Boston
Thus is the genesis of the prominent Irish diaspora in Massachusetts (Plymouth County still has the highest concentration–outside of Ireland–of those with Irish ancestry); the diaspora that took “blue-blooded” Boston by storm; the diaspora that mastered the blood-sport of Boston politics; the diaspora that within a couple of generations, proudly elected one of their own as President of The United States: President John F Kennedy.
In my office, there is an authentic sign that reads, “No Irish Need Apply.” There is a simple reason I keep that sign on display. It motivates me. Oppression is the great motivator. And the oppression of the Irish, both in Ireland and in America, affected our culture immensely. We had to work harder; we had to study harder; we were inculcated by our parents and grandparents with the belief that hard work and education cut the key to freedom.
With cultural beliefs such as these, one can theorize that Will Hunting from Southie is a non-fictional character. But we do not need to speculate when one can cite the multiplicity of Will Huntings from Southie.
Let’s start with Senator Joseph Moakley: a man from the Old Harbor Housing Projects in Southie (today it is often called Mary Ellen McCormick). Moakley grew up in public housing and fought for his country in World War II, even though he did not have to–he lied about his age when he enlisted.
He went on to graduate from Suffolk Law School (Suffolk Law School named their new library after The Honorable Joseph Moakley). He was a state representative, a state senator, and then a Congressman who labored his whole career for the working man, never forgetting the oppression in the collective Irish memory.
The talent of folks from Southie is all-encompassing. Although we do have numerous political heroes, we have sports heroes too. For instance, Southie is home to the first winner of an Olympic Gold Medal in 1500 years, James Connolly. He won the triple jump.
Stanley Cup Champion, Brian Noonan, is also from Southie’s housing projects. Never forgetting where he first got his start, after winning the cup, he brought it to Southie’s Murphy Rink, where I got to behold the most cherished trophy in sports. His gesture made every Southie hockey player believe in himself and herself.
“Wait,” you’re saying, “Will Hunting is an intellectual genius. The people you listed are talented, but not one of them is a rocket scientist.” True. Let’s amend this careless oversight.
Southie is proud to call Eugene Lally a native son, and he is indeed a rocket scientist. He assisted NASA with their Apollo Programs and pioneered digital photography.
Southie folks are not just characters in movies–they are also Hollywood Actors. Brian Goodman became an actor after spending 20 years in prison. Authenticity is his hallmark. He actually included former “marks” (the drug dealers and underworld folks that he robbed) as characters in movies. Goodman’s filmography is incredible: Catch me If You Can, The Last Castle, The Fast and The Furious, etc. One could go on forever with his filmography.
The Irish are well-known for their talented writers: James Joyce, William Butler Yeats, Jonathan Swift, George Bernard Shaw. My hero Michael Patrick MacDonald belongs in that pantheon of great Irish writers.
MacDonald grew up in the Old Colony Projects in Southie. His book, All Souls – A Family Story From Southie, illustrates the great Southie paradox. Although there are many blessings bequeathed to the Southie’s young people, there are dark elements at play in this neighborhood.
Irish culture forged under the heavy yoke of English oppression had arrived in Southie. Souhie’s Irish diaspora suppresses painful memories and obfuscates the true past to “outsiders” (Freud said that the only race impervious to psychoanalysis is the Irish because of their propensity to keep their problems hidden).
However, the world is now aware of the dark elements at play in Southie. My family knew James “Whitey” Bulger, Senate President Bulger’s brother (one the most powerful gangster–the other the most powerful gangster) ended up becoming the FBI’s most wanted man. And not too long ago he made international news after getting caught in Santa Monica with hundreds of thousands of dollars and an arsenal of guns hidden in the walls of his apartment.
Organized crime is a scourge in ethnic, urban neighborhoods, especially black, Italian, and Irish neighborhoods. Each of these cultures faced violence and oppression from those that who were supposed to keep the peace and promote justice.
Speaking of social justice, Michael Patrick McDonald has done community work for every part of Boston suffering from violence, drug epidemics, or any type of despair. Michael Patrick MacDonald now spends his life trying to improve the lives of the working-poor people of Boston. He helped to start Boston Gun Buy Back Program. He is Writer and Residence at Northeastern. He is someone, as a firm believer in Jesuit Principles, that I emulate.
Southie is also the hometown of Pulitzer Prize winning playwright, lyricist, and screenwriter, David Lindsay-Abaire. He won The Pulitzer Prize for his 2007 drama, Rabbit Hole. He hails from West 5th St.
Obviously, the Irish are prolific writers, and I cannot mention all of Southie’s writers.
The last two “Will Huntings” are special to me for different reasons, but I hold them both in the highest regard.
Speaker of The House John McCormack served in The United States House of Representatives from 1928-1971. He served in World War I. In 1940, he became House Majority Leader. “You’ll never get anything done without Democratic help,” he often yelled across the aisle to his Republican colleagues in the 1950’s during the Eisenhower Administration.
Any student of history or politics must note that during the passage of The New Deal Legislation, he was serving in the party leadership (the second highest-ranking Democrat). He became Speaker for 9 years, and the legislation passed under his Speakership makes for one of the finest legacies of any Speaker.
He was an early advocate of Civil Rights and the Speaker of The House when The Civil Right’s Act of 1964 was made law (I only wish that that the The self-professed liberals I’ve met who are so quick to generalize Southie as racists knew that it was under the auspices of our native son, John McCormack, that Civil Rights Laws were passed). Speaker McCormick also advocated for and signed laws protecting early education, health care, and elderly welfare. McCormack was a legislative giant who helped pass Great Society’s Reforms. After the assassination of President Kennedy, Speaker McCormack became next in line for the presidency.
The next giant that I am to mention comes from the housing project in Southie named after Speaker John McCormack’s mother, Mary Ellen McCormack. His name is Senate President William Bulger. He and most original Old Harbor families like mine would most likely call our neighborhood Old Harbor; although none of us forgot what the McCormack family did for us.
William Bulger is a true Jesuit-trained intellectual. At Boston College High School, by the time we graduate, we are ready to “be men for others.” In other words, we will spend our everyday to help those in need. And Senate President Bulger always heeded the virtues that The Jesuits taught him to strive for.
And after going to BC High, BC, and BC Law, earning the honorable title Triple Eagle, his Jesuit education was bound to influence the rest of his life. He became a public servant: First as Massachusetts State Rep, then State Senator. As state senator he was elected Senate President. He served from 1971-1994, which is the longest tenure ever held by someone in that position.
He was a political mastermind. But the reason folks love him still to this day is because of his renowned constituent service–another example of Southie’s loyalty and empathy at work. Bulger would field calls on his own and get back to people on his own. That is unheard of now in the Massachusetts State House. The proudest day of my life was when William Bulger, who graduated exactly 50 years before me at BC High, and ironically handed me my B.C. High diploma.
One would be hard-pressed to find such ubiquitous talent in a town of this size. Good Will Hunting should not be seen as a story about a genius whose Southie upbringing makes him an anomaly in a town that is bereft of talented people and intellectuals. Indeed, the opposite is true. Southie, a town with a culture influenced by the oppression of our ancestors; it is a town full of talent. But most importantly, Southie’s educated political leaders proved that a neighborhood of empathy and compassion underlies the rough exterior.
Only a truly powerful group of ideological dogmatists, well-funded by our wealthiest citizens, could redefine American democracy, unscrupulously steal the sovereignty of the American people, and obscure the belief in the progressive economic values subscribed to by The Constitution’s Framers.
Friedman/Hayek’s Chicago School of economics is a laissez faire, capitalist ideology parasitic by nature. Our Founding Father’s fought a revolution, created a Federal Constitution, state constitutions, a bi-cameral legislative Congress, The Bill of Rights, the executive branch headed by the president, and a judicial branch headed by the SJC, to protect us from this evolving parasite. Their knowledge of the failures of past experiments in democratic-republican governments compelled them to issue forewarnings that would survive 231 years. Madison said:
The instability, injustice, and confusion, introduced into the public councils, have, in truth, been the mortal diseases under which popular governments perished….”
– James Madison, The Federalist. Barnes and Noble Classics. p52 brilliance of the ideology is that like any bug that causes disease, it adapts.
Success is what matters to its Friedman School adherents, not popularity. They don’t measure their success in polling data. Whether people agree with their belief that social programs should be privatized or abolished, that departments of the federal government that protect the environment should be shuttered, does not matter to them. That a majority agree with progressives on the issues, does not matter to them. The parasitic neoliberal, Friedman economic model embeds itself in our government and unscrupulously redefines the language of our Constitution. Freedom has become a word that connotes Friedman Capitalism. When the government makes use of its economic regulatory powers and when it properly conducts the oversight of Wall Street, it is infringing on freedom.
The Orwellian nature of this parasitic ideology is so blatant, yet people have an historical amnesia when it comes to American History, so it’s easy to change the meaning of the ubiquitous words of our republic, like the word freedom, which actually has nothing to do with corporations and money, but is defined as the right to do what one pleases, except when it infringes on another’s right to freedom.
The retail industry, corporations, and workers now have an economic relationship that closely resembles feudalism. The peasant retail workers do all the work and get paid minimum wage. They are only given less than 40 hours so benefits are not provided. Upper Management probably gets full time hours and benefits. They are the feudal agents who keep the peasants labor production high. The feudal lords are the folks sitting 60 stories above the real world. They are the CEO’s, CFO’s, COO’s who rake in millions of dollars while their workers struggle to stay financially stable.
These corporate feudal lords are more powerful than the people; they sponsor the government that is supposed to be the most powerful institution in the country since it represent the voice of the people and God. Vox populi, vox dei. The voice of the people is the voice of God. Yet our Congresspeople mute the voice of the people. They are puppets of their corporate contributors. Alexander Hamilton writes:
The power of the head of the nation was commonly too weak, either to preserve the public peace, or to protect the people against their oppression of their immediate lords.
Later in The Federalist, he states:
A government ought to contain in itself every power requisite to the full accomplishments of the objects committed to its care, and to the complete execution of the trusts for which it is responsible; free from every other control but a regard to the public good and to the sense of the people.
It is blasphemy when neoliberals talk about “shrinking the federal government so that it can fit down the sink.” We fought wars and spilled blood to to save a government for the people, by the people, and of the people. The Revolutionary War and the Civil War began when the blood of Massachusetts’ men were shot and killed.
Anyone who talks about shrinking the role of the Federal Government, is euphemistically talking about ending our democratic-republic–ending the sovereign power of the people.
How did this e
Since the election of Reagan, the first neoliberal who was able to manipulate the people into voting against their own economic interests, the middle class has slowly disappeared, now we listen for the sound of the death knell of the middle class.
Reagan cut taxes for the wealthy, cut federal funding to social programs, fired 11,000 airline workers who were on strike, fighting for fair wages and benefits. Reagan fired all of them. That was the first big blow to unions. All across the country, organized labor is under attack. The neoliberals want to turn us into their feudal peasants. The students of Friedman seek to take away the power of the mult
Trsump appealed to white people by scapegoating people of color and people who pray differently. The Trump Campaign stayed away from issues whenever possible. Their campaign was emotive, striking racist tones, instilling fear, and promoting hate. Trump’s message was the opposite of Obama’s, but appealing to fear and hate and other base human emotions is something that Hillary did not understand.
The only progressive candidate of late to understand that politics is won by appealing to the voter’s emotion rather than his stance on issues is President Obama. Aware that once a candidate politically categorizes oneself, enemies are created–passionate enemies–and aware that Americans were exasperated with hyper-partisanship, Obama’s rhetoric often cited principles that all Americans share–he espoused a message of unity. President Obama allowed the pundits to argue and define his political philosophy.
Speaking of ideological categorizing, for the sake of simplicity, I will refer to the aforementioned parasitic, purist capitalism that currently threatens our democratic-republic by the name most folks presently refer to it as: neoliberalism.
Neoliberalism’s biggest success in the judicial branch of our government happened under Chief Justice Robert’s conservative Supreme Court’s “Citizens United v FEC” decision. Charles and David Koch own one of the wealthiest privately held corporations on the planet with Koch Industries, and are surpassed only by Bill Gates and Warren Buffet in wealth. The Koch Brothers and their likeminded corporate cohorts ensured that the SJC would side with the neoliberal agenda in the Citizens United decision. So personally invested in the decision’s outcome that the Kochs not last only donated money, but deployed their own Koch Industries attorney, Ted Olson, to argue their neoliberal position.
Those neoliberal positions do not reflect any of the American principles lain out by our Founding Fathers. Show me one document that does not prove neoliberalism antonymic to American values.
Koch and his neo-liberal cohorts believe that the government should not invest in social programs the benefit our most vulnerable citizens; they do not believe that the wealthy should pay a higher percentage of taxes; and they believe that the departments of the federal government that regulate corporate greed should be abolished. The Federal Government keeps corporations in check through federal oversight and through regulatory practices. Neo-liberals want the government to serve corporations, rather than corporations serve government. (Hamburger, Tom. “The Koch Brother’s Impact on America’s Political System.” Opinions. The Washington Post. [15 January 2016] https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-koch-brothers-impact-on-the-american-political-system/2016/01/15/6a3694aa-b579-11e5-9388-466021d971de_story.html Accessed 28 August 2017)
The Citizens United decision has infected our federal election process with the parasitic, neoliberal ideology. Our candidates are no longer responsive to the needs of their consituents–they are responsive to the needs of their corporate sponsors. The spirit of Alexander Hamilton would be vexed to find that our democratic-republic had been highjacked by the greedy and self-interested men and women of our day:
A government ought to contain in itself every power requisite to the full accomplishments of the objects committed to its care, and the complete execution of the trust for which it it responsible; free from every other control but a regard to the public good and to the sense of the people.
– Alexander Hamilton. The Federalist (New York: 2006) p. 165
Neo-liberals seek the destruction of any component of the federal government that doesn’t protect their private property and mthe source of most of their wealth, international trade. Social programs that benefit the poorest citizens are socialist–in the neoliberal myopic political mindst hey receive no benefits from an educated, economically hopeful hoi polloi. Neoliberals rebuke social programs as sources of higher taxes, rather than a public good necessary for societal stability.
Yet if neo-liberals are to refer to those who believe in a progressive taxation system in which the wealthy pay more in taxes, while the poor benefit from the redistribution of wealth, then they must call the Framers of the Constitution socialists as well. Alexander Hamilton writes:
…make it a fixed point of policy in the national administration, to go as far as may be practicable in making the luxury of the rich tributary to the public treasury, in order to diminish the necessity of those impositions, which might create dissatisfaction in the poorer and most numerous classes of society. Happy it is when the interest which the government has in the preservation of it own power, coincides with a proper distribution of the public burthens, and tends to guard the least wealthy part of the community from oppression! (Boldness mine) (Ibid. p. 192)
Perhaps the parasitic neo-liberal ideology has infected our collective knowledge of history. The men who founded this country were some of the most progressive men of their day.
Our Founders believed that the power of the federal government made up of the people should be more powerful than any other institution, including corporations, and that when the federal government failed to do so, the state governments were compelled to protect individual liberty. If the states and federal governments ultimately failed to protect individual liberty, then they believed in the people’s right to rebel.
The Founders believed that the government had a role in taking care of its most vulnerable citizens. And they believed in a progressive tax system in which the wealthy paid their fair share of taxes, so that society could continue to progress. Neo-liberalism is un-American to the core. Progressivism is the ideology this country and its constitution was built on.
Ed Flynn grew up and still lives in South Boston, one of the neighborhoods that make up our District 2. He shares the collective values of our diverse district of Bay Village, Beacon Hill, Chinatown, The South End, and South Boston. And that is I will vote for him on November 7, 2017
come rain, sleet, or snow.
This is one of the most important elections in recent memory. There was a time when coaching youth sports, participation in neighborhood associations, and service to one’s country was a requisite to running for public office.
Only one candidate running has consistently demonstrated his devotion to our nation and our community. Ed Flynn is a combat veteran who served in the Navy for 25 years. He is a member of City Side Neighborhood Association, South Boston Citizens’ Association, and coaches youth sports. Furthermore, he is an active parent at the Josiah Quincy School in Chinatown. Massachusetts is one of the only Constitutions in the world that guarantees public as a right. Ed Flynn’s commitment to the right to public education is unwavering, and he has a personal stake in our education system as the parent of a student in the one of Boston Public Schools.
Only one candidate has experience promulgating our collective values into effective public policy. Ed Flynn worked for five years in the Department of Labor where he fought to improve labor conditions, expand access to health care, and increase the federal minimum wage.
Ed Flynn believes Boston’s diversity to be one of its greatest strengths, and with District 2 being such a diverse district, it is imperative that we elect someone who celebrates Boston’s diversity. I am voting for Ed Flynn because he will represent the core values of this diverse district. I am voting for Ed Flynn because he spent his entire adult life serving his country and his community. I am voting for Ed Flynn on the September 26 Primary Election and the November 7 General Election. He earned my vote because he is man of strong moral fiber who has dedicated his life to serving our country and our district, and he will be the independent, progressive voice we need in City Hall.